Pro-business versus Pro-markets

Survey says that India’s aspiration of becoming a $5 trillion economy depends critically on:

    • Promoting ‘pro-business’ policy that unleashes the power of competitive markets to generate wealth.
    • Weaning away from ‘pro-crony’ policy that may favour specific private interests, especially powerful incumbents.
  • Viewed from the lens of the Stock market, creative destruction increased significantly post-liberalisation:
    • Before liberalisation, a Sensex firm expected to stay in it for 60 years, which decreased to only 12 years after liberalisation.
    • Every five years, one-third of Sensex firms are churned out, reflecting the continuous influx of new firms, products and technologies into the economy.
  • Despite impressive progress in enabling competitive markets, pro-crony policies destroyed value in the economy:
    • An equity index of connected firms significantly outperformed market by 7 per cent a year from 2007 to 2010, reflecting abnormal profits extracted at common citizens’ expense.
    • In contrast, the index underperforms market by 7.5 % from 2011, reflecting inefficiency and value destruction inherent in such firms.
  • Pro-crony policies such as discretionary allocation of natural resources till 2011 led to rent-seeking by beneficiaries while competitive allocation of the same post 2014 ended such rent extraction.
  • Similarly crony lending that led to wilful default, wherein promoters collectively siphoned off wealth from banks, led to losses that dwarf subsidies for rural development.