Pro-changers (Swarajists) and No-Changers
The abrupt withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement disillusioned many; they began to question the fundamental strategy of nationalist leadership.
- The period 1922-29 enriched India's struggle by introducing new trends and forms of political action. Some leaders began to explore alternative approaches, such as participating in legislative councils Council Entry), while others continued the constructive work.
Pro-changers (Swarajists) and No-Changers
- In 1922, the Non-Cooperation Movement had finished, Gandhiji was in jail, and there was confusion about the next political steps.
- However, the leaders agreed later that immediate civil disobedience wasn’t possible.
- They decided that a break was needed from the active movement to boost morale ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Related Content
- 1 Feudal Polity in Early Medieval India
- 2 Gupta Kings: Chandragupta I, Samudragupta & Vikramaditya
- 3 Decentralized Governance in the Gupta Age
- 4 Mauryan Kings: Chandragupta and Ashoka
- 5 Delhi Sultanate: Dynasties & Rulers
- 6 Delhi Sultanate: Political System & Governance
- 7 Tribal Political Organisation in Early Vedic Period
- 8 Rise of Monarchical Power in Mahajanapadas
- 9 Centralized Monarchy during Mauryan Empire
- 10 Evolution of the Indian Civil Service (ICS) During the British Era

