Tribunals in India: Efficiency vs Judicial Independence
Tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies established to reduce the burden on regular courts and provide specialized, speedy, and affordable justice in specific domains. Originally envisioned as an alternative to the cumbersome litigation process, their functioning has become a subject of intense debate, primarily revolving around the conflict between their supposed efficiency and the fundamental principle of judicial independence. This tension is a central theme in India's ongoing efforts to reform its justice delivery system.
Recent Developments
- Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021: Abolished several tribunals (e.g., IPAB, Film Certification Appellate Tribunal), transferring cases to High Courts. While aimed at efficiency, critics warn ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Related Content
Indian Polity And Governance
- 1 State Autonomy Demands and the Limits of Article 356
- 2 Centre-State Disputes over Legislative Domains
- 3 States’ Demand for Increased Financial Autonomy
- 4 Water Sharing and Border Disputes
- 5 Governance, Administrative Autonomy and Development Challenges of Union Territories
- 6 Competitive Federalism
- 7 Legislative Competence in New Tech Sectors
- 8 16th Finance Commission & Fiscal Federalism
- 9 Caste Census and the Constitutional Mandate for Equality
- 10 NITI Aayog@10: Fostering Cooperative Federalism
