Gupta Period: Decentralised Administration and Role of Local Units
The administration of the Gupta Empire marked a notable departure from the highly centralized model of the Mauryas. It was characterized by a decentralized, quasi-feudal structure where local autonomy and the power of local elites—including guilds and community councils—increased significantly.
Key Administrative Features
- Feudatory Chiefs (Samantas): A major portion of the empire was governed indirectly by numerous feudatory chiefs (Samantas) who were subjugated by the Gupta emperors. These chiefs paid tribute, attended the imperial court, and offered military and marital alliances, but retained a significant degree of autonomy over their internal administration.
- Hereditary Posts: Many high administrative and military offices became ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Related Content
Indian History
- 1 Tribal Political Organisation in Early Vedic Period
- 2 Rise of Monarchical Power in Mahajanapadas
- 3 Centralized Monarchy during Mauryan Empire
- 4 Mauryan Kings: Chandragupta and Ashoka
- 5 Decentralized Governance in the Gupta Age
- 6 Gupta Kings: Chandragupta I, Samudragupta & Vikramaditya
- 7 Feudal Polity in Early Medieval India
- 8 Delhi Sultanate: Political System & Governance
- 9 Delhi Sultanate: Dynasties & Rulers
- 10 Mughal Political System & Governance