Proxy Participation in PRIs
On 26th February 2025, an advisory committee submitted its report, titled “Transforming Women’s Representation and Roles in Panchayati Raj Systems and Institutions: Eliminating Efforts for Proxy Participation” to the Ministry of Panchayati Raj.
- The Supreme Court in Mundona Rural Development Foundation vs. UoI (2023) directed the formation of a committee to look into the proxy involvement in the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs).
Issues Highlighted
- India has about 2.63 lakh panchayats in all three tiers – Gram Panchayat (at village level), Panchayat Samiti (at block level) and Zila Parishad (at district level) – with 32.29 lakh elected representatives, of which 15.03 ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Related Content
- 1 Permanent Lok Adalat
- 2 SC Sets Deadline for Presidential Decision on Reserved Bills
- 3 SC Moots Minimum Vote Threshold for Unopposed Candidates in Elections
- 4 Courts can Modify Arbitral Awards: Supreme Court
- 5 Standing Committee Report on Welfare of Indian Diaspora and Status of Emigration Bill
- 6 NITI Aayog Workshop on “Developing Ecosystem for Assistive Technology in India”
- 7 Women and Men in India 2024: Selected Indicators and Data
- 8 Panchayat Advancement Index 2022-23
- 9 Parliamentary Panel Recommends Revamping of MGNREGS
- 10 ECI’s New Initiatives to Enhance Accuracy and Accessibility of Electoral Rolls

- 1 NAKSHA Programme
- 2 Concerns over Delimitation Exercise
- 3 First Edition of SOUL Leadership Conclave
- 4 Extension of National Commission for Safai Karamcharis (NCSK)
- 5 Digital Brand Identity Manual
- 6 Government Directive against AI Tools
- 7 Status of Devolution to Panchayats in States
- 8 Supreme Court’s Directions on Remission Policy for Convicts