Law and Order in Mauryan and Gupta Empires
The police systems of the Mauryan and Gupta periods reflect their different administrative philosophies: the Mauryan model was highly centralized and rigorous, while the Gupta system was more decentralized and benevolent.
Mauryan Empire
- Centralized Structure: The empire's capital, Pataliputra, had a well-defined police department under a city superintendent (Nagaraka). This official was responsible for maintaining law and order, overseeing registration of births and deaths, and ensuring security.
- Hierarchical Administration: At the district level, officials known as Rajukas were tasked with both revenue collection and law enforcement. Village watchmen (Gramani) reported to higher authorities, creating a top-down chain of command.
- Extensive Spy ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
To get access to detailed content
Already a Member? Login here
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material since 2018 of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Indian History
- 1 Feudal Polity in Early Medieval India
- 2 Gupta Kings: Chandragupta I, Samudragupta & Vikramaditya
- 3 Decentralized Governance in the Gupta Age
- 4 Mauryan Kings: Chandragupta and Ashoka
- 5 Delhi Sultanate: Dynasties & Rulers
- 6 Delhi Sultanate: Political System & Governance
- 7 Tribal Political Organisation in Early Vedic Period
- 8 Rise of Monarchical Power in Mahajanapadas
- 9 Centralized Monarchy during Mauryan Empire
- 10 Evolution of the Indian Civil Service (ICS) During the British Era

