Supreme Court Upholds Hanging as a Valid Method of Execution

On 18th August 2026, the Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling, upheld hanging as a constitutionally permissible method of executing the death penalty, rejecting a challenge seeking its replacement with alternative methods.

  • The Court declined to reconsider its earlier position in Deena v. Union of India (1983).

Why Was Hanging Challenged?

  • Article 21 and Human Dignity: The petitioners argued that the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 includes the right to a humane and dignified manner of execution.
  • Possibility of Excessive Suffering: Concerns were raised over whether hanging necessarily causes immediate unconsciousness and death.
  • Scientific Uncertainty: The effectiveness of the ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
To get access to detailed content
Buy October 2026 Issue

Already a Member? Login here

Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Be an Annual Subscriber

Related Content