- Home
- Current Affairs
- Current News
- Supreme Court Ruling on Governors’ Veto Power over Bills
Supreme Court Ruling on Governors’ Veto Power over Bills
- 25 Nov 2023
Recently, the Supreme Court established clear guidelines regarding the actions of a Governor when withholding assent to a Bill, emphasizing the prompt return of the Bill to the State Legislature.
Key Points
- Governors Mandated to Send Bills Back Promptly: The Supreme Court asserts that Governors must promptly send back a Bill to the State Legislature if they choose to withhold assent. The emphasis is on expeditious communication.
- No Discretion for Governors if Bill is Reiterated: In the event of the State Assembly reiterating the Bill, with or without amendments, Governors are stripped of any choice or discretion and are obligated to grant assent.
- Article 200 and Legislative Authority: The court interprets Article 200, stating that while Governors can withhold assent, the subsequent actions must strictly follow the constitutional mandate, ensuring communication to the State Legislature for reconsideration.
- Legislature's Autonomy in Decision-Making: The court emphasizes that the final decision on accepting the Governor's advice, conveyed through the message, rests solely with the legislature.
- The expression 'if the Bill is passed again … with or without amendments' indicates the legislature's autonomy.
- Governor's Role and Constitutional Limits: The court underscores that a Governor withholding a Bill without further action is in violation of the Constitution.
- It warns against potential misuse of power, preventing the unelected Head of State from vetoing the elected legislature's functioning.
- Constitutional Imperative of Expedition: The judgment stresses that Bills should be sent back to the Legislature "as soon as possible" with a mandatory message.
- The term "as soon as possible" is deemed a constitutional imperative of expedition, preventing undue delays.
- Verdict's Implication on Tamil Nadu's Case: While the judgment originated from a petition filed by the Punjab government, its implications are seen as significant for Tamil Nadu.
- The verdict could impact the case where the Governor withheld assent to crucial Bills returned by the Tamil Nadu Assembly.
News Crux
News Crux
News Crux
- Appointment & Resignation
- Art/Culture/Heritage
- Awards In News
- Bill/Act/Amendment
- Defence
- Defence/Military Exercises
- Famous Books
- Important Days/Weeks
- Important Decade
- Miscellaneous
- Obituary
- Organisation In News
- Persons In News
- Places In News
- Plans & Policy
- Reports/Committee/Commission
- Scheme & Programme
- Species In News
- Summit, Seminars & Conferences
- Survey/Index
- Web Portal & Apps
State In News
State In News
State In News
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chhattisgarh
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu And Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttarakhand
- West Bengal